I am keenly aware that my minister links to my blog from his, The Farthest Shore. As such, I feel kind of hesitant at times to express some of my thoughts about faith. But, sometimes I feel that being an agitator, and making folks uneasy, comes so easily to me that it must have something to do with my mission in life. So, here goes.
When I came upon a clarity of faith earlier this year, my main obstacle was skepticism about the resurrection. I transcended that one through a lot of prayer, reading, discussion and more prayer. It felt and feels right, and I haven’t looked back and doubted.
How that faith has played out in my choice of church membership, however, is something I now grapple with. I became a member of a moderate Baptist congregation whose members, while belonging to another church in town, rejected membership in the Southern Baptist Convention due to its requirement for Baptist churches to promise adherence to a specific creed which was fundamentalist and socially conservative in its nature. The Baptist history is one that eschews one-size-fits-all creeds, and there were enough progressive folks in the church at the time that they broke off to form the church I have joined.
Now that the pink cloud of being baptized has kind of dissipated, I am thinking less of my own journey than about that of others, particularly those folks who feel unwelcomed in a Christian church of any stripe due to the perceived, and actual, intolerance for homosexuals. “The Great Commission” is what the older church folks call it — this is Christ’s call to bring others into faith, and it’s what gives more annoying Christians to the tendency to place silly tracts in your hands, and ask you if you are saved. A neighbor of mine in Fredericksburg was particularly anxious to convert me because I was a Unitarian Universalist, and she thought that I was a member of the Unification Church (aka, a “Moonie”). Maybe it’s because I was from NYC and hung out a lot at airports…just kidding. I didn’t try to divest her of this belief because I thought it was really funny.
I was brought to this church by a progressive couple who lives here in Charlottesville. I felt more comfortable with the folks here who seemed to be receptive to my talking in my usual in-your-face way about things. Or else it’s the Virginia “smile in your face and hate you in private” approach — another thing I don’t mess anymore with because, like my misguided neighbor, I think it’s really funny.
At the same time, what’s not funny is what’s not being said. If they left the other church to avoid adherence to a creed, and if the Baptist way is to come to your own faith, why are homosexuals not visible in the congregation? They could be there, but there’s a “don’t ask, don’t tell” kind of feeling about it. I got some feedback, privately, from a couple of folks about the likelihood we could join AWAB (The Association of Welcoming & Affirming Baptists) as a congregation. The response from both, in short, was, to paraphrase, “not bloody likely.”
I’m troubled that I didn’t do my homework before joining this church, and wonder why I’d want to bring anyone into a congregation that does not openly support homosexuals. My two gay sisters would have to be closeted to avoid being shunned by some members. How can I stay, and how stupid have I been not to have really understood.
I’m left with the age-old conundrum: Do I leave to find a more welcoming corner of the world, or agitate from within what I find to be a broken interpretation of Christ’s love? In all honesty, I don’t know the answer to that question. Despite this bit of marketing fluff, I know from experience that in the Unitarian Universalist faith, Christian faith is openly mocked (so much for the “first principle”), so there’s no going back there for me. In the Christian tradition, homosexual “practice” (how the CBF refers to homosexual orientation) is shunned. Where do I belong afterall, and how “great” is the commission that would deny Christ the opportunity to have dinner at the house of an openly “practicing” (ugh!) homosexual.
I always THOUGHT Zaccheus was gay ![]()
Tags: American Culture, Faith, Personal Courage





7 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://againsttheglass.com/againsttheglass/2007/08/25/old-wineskins/trackback/
August 31, 2007 at 11:10 pm
Pingback from againsttheglass.com » The Theory of Everything, and Why I Can’t Sustain a Professional Blog
August 28, 2007 at 11:59 am
Pat Owen
When I was 14 or 15, I sang in my church choir. This was the church I had attended all my life and many in the congregation were like family to me.
One Sunday we were visited by an opera singer who was a close friend of the choir director. She had asked him to sing a solo and I remember him being a wonderful baritone. This wonderful baritone also happened to be black. When the door to the choir loft opened and the choir came out, there were gasps from some in the congregation and some of the old ladies actually got up and left church. While nothing else was ever said about this incident, it was to this day my most embarrassing and dark moment in a church setting.
Now, being an impressionable young man, I could have learned from this to be a bigot. After all, these were people I respected and had grown up around. On the other side of the coin, I could have had the opportunity to use this as a positive learning experience and to make myself a better person, a person that tries to practice inclusion to everyone. I think I took the high road.
The point to my sharing this story or ramble is this. You will never ever be able to change the minds of some or shake them out of their comfort zone. Just like those little old ladies thirty years ago represented a small percentage of the congregation who were closed minded, there are some today who will never see much less agree with your point. You don’t throw your up your hands and quit though nor do you “agitate†from within. Maybe educate would be a better word. The question you should ask yourself is, “Why was I led to Broadus?†rather than “Should I leave?†Possibly, just perhaps, the answer is to help open eyes and to enlighten those who have the ability to grow in Christ’s love for all. I think you’ve already started to do that!
August 28, 2007 at 1:23 pm
saracup
Pat,
Yea–I use “agitate” to be dramatic, but I think that educate is far more appropriate
Thank you for your thoughtful reply. It’s good to see that at least the conversation can take place, and some risks can be taken. I don’t see Christ as wanting me to keep silent at what looks like injustice, but I do understand, having come from an old, traditional background that you can’t make older folks feel badly about long-held views. It’s a balance.
I am coming as well to accept that I need to remain at Broadus for myriad reasons. I can’t be the only person there who feels this way (as a matter of fact, I know at least one other), so, who knows? Maybe those of us who support homosexual inclusiveness will come out of the closet slowly.
I need to learn patience
-Cathy
August 28, 2007 at 7:20 pm
Steve
Tough question. Maybe your role is to be the one person who opens up the minds of others in your congregation. If others see you showing love to gay people, maybe that will touch them in a way talking never can.
September 4, 2007 at 8:30 pm
Amy
Hey - just wanted to say 1st, thanks for the comment on the working moms blog - was happy to see your site! 2: as a Unitarian Universalist, I have to defend a bit and say that, at least at my church, Christianity is far from shunned - there’s even a weekly service for Christians there. I grew up as a Christian missionary, and have been around the block with the various denominations. There are several liberal ones that embrace homosexuality - I think in our town there’s even a Baptist congregation that’s more flexible. I appreciate your challenge of your faith - if it can’t survive your questions, it can’t be considered to be very robust, can it? I’m sure whatever god you believe in can handle it.
September 4, 2007 at 8:45 pm
Duane
I believe both sides have overly defined the outcomes. One side says that the only acceptable outcome is judgment while the other will only accept broad acceptance.
There is something to be said about holding a high standard for a community of faith, but there are many sins which are tolerated (drunkedness comes to mind) far more than the choice to be gay. The inconsistency is more alarming to me than the exceptionalism given to sexual immorality.
October 6, 2007 at 10:14 am
Robin Edgar
Yes it is most regrettable that a goodly number of U*U “Welcoming Congregations” are anything but welcoming to Chritsians, and that includes Christian-oriented GBLT people of course. . .