I’m someone with few boundaries, which is probably not a good thing on a social level. However, my boundarilessness (word? why not!) manifests sometimes in being able to make connections among things that seem disparate. Some folks I work with would call that “alchemy” and simple mathematics would then say that if I can make chemical reactions in my own head, then imagine all the other reactions that can be created by knocking heads (and hearts) with others. Perhaps the synthesis of a new world.
I think that is what is happening in our day and age. The age of private thought gave way to the 90s age of expository autobiography, performance artists I used to follow like Karen Finley (pure genius) and Annie Sprinkle (completely insane), and the celebrity tell-alls about their rehab experiences. I rode the crest of that one, writing a one-woman show about women and body image called “Busy Being Beautiful,” which was pointed squarely at the complicated relationship I had with my father, and ultimately myself. I found through that experience, and other performance experiences, that the more personal I got, the more universal the experience appeared to be. I think a teacher in design school told me that once, but I didn’t believe her.
Lots of my expository, boundary-hopping navel-gazing writing and performances made me realize that the tree, while falling in the woods, does NOT make a sound until someone else hears it. I guess J.D. Salinger may feel otherwise, but, for me, the audience made the message come full circle, and led to more writing. The writing, and its witness, made for more writing.
In this regard, blogging has been kind of a natural for me as I have met minds and people online that I would otherwise not have met. And the small talk is eliminated — I meet them while talking about all that is near and dear to me (at that moment, anyway). But professional blogging is hard because things in my personal and professional life seem so related that separating them seems to defeat the purpose of the way I synthesize ideas. So, I opt for the personal blog and, in this particular post, will try, lamely, to speak to a revelation I am having about the “aha” connections I am having between participation in social networking technologies in both my personal and professional lives. For what it’s worth. Tree falling.
I recently posted about my discoveries regarding being a new Christian discovering the tense, and to me, inscrutable, relationship many Christians have with the issue of homosexuality. That post yielded interesting results.
I don’t get close to folks easily. So, although I am quite fond of the lion’s share of folks at my new church, I am also at arms distance with them in a lot of ways. I am conscious, in most contexts, that I’m a bit of an oddball. That blog post resulted in folks I had never even spoken with more than a couple of minutes coming up to me and hugging me at church last night. Folks telling me some deep secrets of their lives. Folks inviting me to lunch, wanting a ride home to talk. The minister’s wife telling me, very pointedly and angrily that I CANNOT LEAVE.
I didn’t blog about this issue to get folks to beg me to stay. I didn’t think of getting folks to do anything, really. I see much of what I do as leaving no footprint behind, as though my guardian angel rolls up the carpet behind me wherever I go so no one will see my mark anywhere. I had not intended to make a “mark,” but in the hearts of some folks, something happened with this little post. The non-homophobes at church appear to be coming out of the closet, and I’m feeling a new calling.
I’m not sure that a performance, which begs for “approval”, would have yielded this generous and thoughtful a response. The popular misconception that technology is depersonalizing the human exchange seems to have been stood on its ear. What may have happened was that, by eliminating the vulnerability of the face-to-face, more genuine feelings ideas were able to be shared.
Now, I would not extend that to online porn, adult chat and other substitutes for real experience. I’m talking about a new experience altogether: asynchronous communication with the world, emanating from a point in time selected by me, hitting others at points in time when they happen or seek to be there, and seeing what bounces back and is spawned as a result of the social risk.
We are working at my job on a grant for creating an environment for learning that is self-directed, iterative, and full of possibilities for these kinds of unanticipated alchemies. All to get to the sweet spot in the mind that characterizes that moment when something is learned, when transformation occurs.
I can’t get to that place, where the little British kids clap their hands in joy to the near-ecstatic chemical reaction, without trudging through all the subconscious soil of my complete mind, boundariless, from gays to Christ, bathroom stalls to baptism. It’s all one big thing in me, one big bubble theory of the messy ALL bouncing up against the other bubbles out there, sometimes merging, sometimes bouncing away.
And that’s why I can’t sustain a professional blog.





Well, when I least expected it, we found a house. THE house. It’s in Hollymead, and it was built in 1979. It’s like a storybook cottage with a gazebo and fish pond in the back yard. Instead of killing ourselves trying to buy it now, we simply asked the owner if we could rent it until we sell our house in Fredericksburg, and they said yes. All has gone well since, including Blake LOVING Hollymead school.


